- it does not accurately reflect the real situation
- it hinders business growth
Now let's dive into a specific example. In the 80's when AT&T's monopoly was just broken up, the marketing ROI was measured. But what is the exact measure? Cost of marketing campaign v.s. total revenue from customers. In most cases it should be fine, but one need to take into account that:
- AT&T is in a monopoly position
- The other notable competitors, Sprint & MCI, have relatively poor quality. So much so that without doing anything AT&T can easily retain 95% of its customer base
Thus, the simple ROI metric above may lead to the wrong conclusion that minimal marketing expenditure is optimal due to its high ROI.
It is always very important to take into account:
- why the metric is in place (i.e. what are we trying to achieve)
- the external environment, and how the metric will shape the business direction
- finally the bottom line of long-term increased revenue and reduced cost (profit)
0 comments:
Post a Comment